Requirements on Long-Term Accessibility and Preservation of Research Results with Particular Regard to Their Provenance

Titelangaben

Weber, Andreas ; Piesche, Claudia:
Requirements on Long-Term Accessibility and Preservation of Research Results with Particular Regard to Their Provenance.
In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. Bd. 5 (2016) Heft 4 . - 49.
ISSN 2220-9964
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5040049

Angaben zu Projekten

Abstract

Since important national and international funders of research projects require statements on the long-term accessibility of research results, many new solutions appeared to fulfil these demands. The solutions are implemented on various scopes, starting from specific solutions for one research group up to solutions with a national focus (i.e., the RADAR project). While portals for globally standardized research data (e.g., climate data) are available, there is currently no provision for the large amount of data resulting from specialized research in individual research foci, the so called long-tail of sciences. In this article we describe the considerations regarding the implementation of a local research data repository for the Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) 840. The main focus will be on the examination of requirements for, and an agenda of, a possible technical implementation. Requirements were derived from a more theoretical examination of similar projects and relevant literature, diverse discussions with researchers and project leaders, by analysis of existing publication data, and finally the prototypical implementation with refining iterations. Notably, the discussions with the researchers lead to new features going beyond the challenges of the mere long-term preservation of research data. Besides the need for an infrastructure that permits long-term preservation and retrieval of research data, our system will allow the reconstruction of the complete provenance of published research results. This requirement is a serious diversification of the problem, because it creates the need to qualify additional transformation data, describing the transformation process from primary research data to research results.