at Google ScholarTitle data
Ouma, Stefan:
Getting in between M and M′ or : How farmland further debunks financialization.
In: Dialogues in Human Geography.
Vol. 5
(2015)
Issue 2
.
- pp. 225-228.
ISSN 2043-8214
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820615588160
Abstract in another language
This commentary takes up some of the arguments Christophers develops in his piece on ‘The Limits to Financialization’ and spins them further through the prism of the ‘financialization’ of farmland and agriculture. The paper requalifies the optic, empiric, and strategic limits of the financialization literature that Christophers identifies, eventually making a call for ‘getting in between’ M and M′—exploring the practical activities of financial economization while at the same time maintaining the analytical validity of the category of capital. This is a frictional project. The contribution ends with a note on strategy, asking whether knowledge about such activities can be of any strategic political use.
Further data
| Item Type: | Article in a journal |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Keywords: | capital; critique; farmland; finance; financialization |
| Institutions of the University: | Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences > Department of Earth Sciences Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences > Department of Earth Sciences > Chair Economic Geography Faculties |
| Result of work at the UBT: | No |
| DDC Subjects: | 500 Science 500 Science > 550 Earth sciences, geology |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Apr 2019 14:45 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Apr 2019 07:18 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/48633 |