bei Google ScholarTitelangaben
Coscieme, Luca ; da Silva Hyldmo, Håkon ; Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro ; Palomo, Ignacio ; Mwampamba, Tuyeni H. ; Selomane, Odirilwe ; Sitas, Nadia ; Jaureguiberry, Pedro ; Takahashi, Yasuo ; Lim, Michelle ; Barral, Maria P. ; Farinaci, Juliana S. ; Diaz-José, Julio ; Ghosh, Sonali ; Ojino, Joyce ; Alassaf, Amani ; Baatuuwie, Bernard N. ; Balint, Lenke ; Basher, Zeenatul ; Boeraeve, Fanny ; Budiharta, Sugeng ; Chen, Ruishan ; Desrousseaux, Maylis ; Dowo, Gregory ; Febria, Catherine ; Ghazi, Houda ; Harmáčková, Zuzana V. ; Jaffe, Rodolfo ; Kalemba, Mphatso M. ; Lambini, Cosmas Dayak Kombat ; Lasmana, Felicia P. S. ; Mohamed, Assem A. A. ; Niamir, Aidin ; Pliscoff, Patricio ; Sabyrbekov, Rahat ; Shrestha, Uttam B. ; Samakov, Aibek ; Sidorovich, Anna A. ; Thompson, Laura ; Valle, Mireia:
Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance.
In: Environmental Science & Policy.
Bd. 104
(2020)
.
- S. 36-42.
ISSN 1462-9011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018
Abstract
Despite increasing scientific understanding of the global environmental crisis, we struggle to adopt the policies science suggests would be effective. One of the reasons for that is the lack of inclusive engagement and dialogue among a wide range of different actors. Furthermore, there is a lack of consideration of differences between languages, worldviews and cultures. In this paper, we propose that engagement across the science-policy interface can be strengthened by being mindful of the breadth and depth of the diverse human-nature relations found around the globe. By examining diverse conceptualizations of “nature” in more than 60 languages, we identify three clusters: inclusive conceptualizations where humans are viewed as an integral component of nature; non-inclusive conceptualizations where humans are separate from nature; and deifying conceptualizations where nature is understood and experienced within a spiritual dimension. Considering and respecting this rich repertoire of ways of describing, thinking about and relating to nature can help us communicate in ways that resonate across cultures and worldviews. This repertoire also provides a resource we can draw on when defining policies and sustainability scenarios for the future, offering opportunities for finding solutions to global environmental challenges.
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel in einer Zeitschrift |
|---|---|
| Begutachteter Beitrag: | Ja |
| Keywords: | Earth jurisprudence; Indigenous peoples; Knowledge systems; Ontological turn; Rights of nature; Science-policy process |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Graduierteneinrichtungen > Bayreuther Graduiertenschule für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften - BayNAT Graduierteneinrichtungen |
| Titel an der UBT entstanden: | Ja |
| Themengebiete aus DDC: | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie |
| Eingestellt am: | 19 Apr 2023 06:49 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 19 Apr 2023 06:49 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/76070 |