bei Google ScholarTitelangaben
Ollerton, Jeff ; Dötterl, Stefan ; Ghorpadé, Kumar ; Heiduk, Annemarie ; Liede-Schumann, Sigrid ; Masinde, Siro ; Meve, Ulrich ; Peter, Craig I. ; Prieto-Benítez, Samuel ; Punekar, Sachin ; Thulin, Mats ; Whittington, Andrew:
Diversity of Diptera families that pollinate Ceropegia (Apocynaceae) trap flowers : An update in light of new data and phylogenetic analyses.
In: Flora : Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants.
Bd. 234
(2017)
.
- S. 233-244.
ISSN 0367-2530
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.07.013
Abstract
Pollination by flies (Diptera) has been important to the diversification and ecology of the flowering plants, but is poorly understood in contrast to pollination by other groups such as bees, butterflies and birds. Within the Apocynaceae the genera Ceropegiaand Riocreuxia temporarily trap flies, releasing them after a fixed, speciesspecific period of time, during which pollination and/or pollen removal occurs. This “trap flower” pollination system shows convergent evolution with unrelated species inother families and fascinated Stefan Vogel for much of his career, leading to groundbreaking work on floral function in Ceropegia(Apocynaceae). In this new study we extend the work of the latest broad analysis published by some of the authors (Ollerton et al., 2009 – Annals of Botany). This incorporates previously unpublished data from India and Africa, as well as recently published information, on the diversity of pollinators exploited by Ceropegia. The analyses are based on a more accuratephylogenetic understanding of the relationships between the major groups, and significantly widens the biogeographic scope of our understanding of fly pollinationwithin Ceropegia. Information about the pollinators of 69 taxa (species, subspecies and natural varieties) of Ceropegia is now available. Twenty five families of Diptera are known to visit the flowers of Ceropegia, of which sixteen are confirmed as pollinators. Most taxa are pollinated by species from a single family. Overall, there were no major biogeographic differences in the types of Diptera that were used in 3 particular regions, though some subtle differences were apparent. Likewise there were no differences between the two major clades of Ceropegia, but clear differenceswhen comparing the range of Diptera exploited by Ceropegia with that of the stapeliads. This clade, one of the largest in the Asclepiadoideae, is a fascinating example of a species radiation driven by an apparently relatively uniform set of pollinators.