at Google ScholarTitle data
Borgoni, Cristina:
Interpretando la Paradoja de Moore : la irracionalidad de una oración mooreana.
In: Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science.
Vol. 23
(2008)
Issue 2
.
- pp. 145-161.
ISSN 2171-679X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.392
Abstract in another language
This paper offers an interpretation of Moore’s Paradox that emphasizes its relevance for our understanding of rationality and linguistic interpretation. The sentences that originate the paradox do not need to be thought of in terms of the absence of a contradiction, but in terms of absence of rationality, where rationality is understood as a broader notion than coherence and logical consistency. This is defended through three theses, two of which stem from the dominant (but insufficient) approaches to the paradox: Moore’s, Wittgenstein’s and Shoemaker’s.
Further data
| Item Type: | Article in a journal |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Institutions of the University: | Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy > Professor Philosophy - Epistemology Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy > Professor Philosophy - Epistemology > Professor Philosophy - Epistemology - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Cristina Borgoni Gonçalves Faculties |
| Result of work at the UBT: | No |
| DDC Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and psychology 100 Philosophy and psychology > 100 Philosophy 100 Philosophy and psychology > 160 Logic |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Apr 2018 08:05 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2024 06:09 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/43090 |