bei Google ScholarTitelangaben
Heidemann, Marcel:
Judgment aggregation and minimal change : a model of consensus formation by belief revision.
In: Theory and Decision.
Bd. 85
(2018)
.
- S. 61-97.
ISSN 1573-7187
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9642-8
Abstract
When a group of agents attempts to reach an agreement on certain issues, it is usually desirable that the resulting consensus be as close as possible to the original judgments of the individuals. However, when these judgments are logically connected to further beliefs, the notion of closeness should also take into account to what extent the individuals would have to revise their entire belief set to reach an agreement. In this work, we present a model for generation of agreement with respect to a given agenda which allows individual epistemic entrenchment to influence the value of the consensus. While the postulates for the transformation function and their construction resemble those of AGM belief revision, the notion of an agenda is adapted from the theory of judgment aggregation. This allows our model to connect both frameworks.
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel in einer Zeitschrift |
|---|---|
| Begutachteter Beitrag: | Ja |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Fakultäten > Kulturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Fakultäten > Kulturwissenschaftliche Fakultät > Institut für Philosophie Fakultäten > Kulturwissenschaftliche Fakultät > Institut für Philosophie > Lehrstuhl Philosophie I Fakultäten > Kulturwissenschaftliche Fakultät > Institut für Philosophie > Lehrstuhl Philosophie I > Lehrstuhl Philosophie I - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Olivier Roy Fakultäten |
| Titel an der UBT entstanden: | Ja |
| Themengebiete aus DDC: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 120 Epistemologie 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 160 Logik |
| Eingestellt am: | 20 Feb 2018 09:03 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 10 Jul 2023 12:11 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/41540 |