Literatur vom gleichen Autor/der gleichen Autor*in
plus bei Google Scholar

Bibliografische Daten exportieren
 

Four principles for improved statistical ecology

Titelangaben

Popovic, Gordana ; Mason, Tanya J. ; Marques, Tiago A. ; Potts, Joanne ; Drobniak, Szymon M. ; Joo, Rocío ; Altwegg, Res ; Burns, Carolyn C. I. ; McCarthy, Michael A. ; Johnston, Alison ; Nakagawa, Shinichi ; McMillan, Louise ; Devarajan, Kadambari ; Taggart, Patrick I. ; Wunderlich, Alison C. ; Mair, Magdalena ; Martínez-Lanfranco, Juan Andrés ; Lagisz, Malgorzata ; Pottier, Patrice P.:
Four principles for improved statistical ecology.
arXiv , 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.01528

Volltext

Link zum Volltext (externe URL): Volltext

Abstract

Increasing attention has been drawn to the misuse of statistical methods over recent years, with particular concern about the prevalence of practices such as poor experimental design, cherry-picking and inadequate reporting. These failures are largely unintentional and no more common in ecology than in other scientific disciplines, with many of them easily remedied given the right guidance.
Originating from a discussion at the 2020 International Statistical Ecology Conference, we show how ecologists can build their research following four guiding principles for impactful statistical research practices: 1. Define a focused research question, then plan sampling and analysis to answer it; 2. Develop a model that accounts for the distribution and dependence of your data; 3. Emphasise effect sizes to replace statistical significance with ecological relevance; 4. Report your methods and findings in sufficient detail so that your research is valid and reproducible.
Listed in approximate order of importance, these principles provide a framework for experimental design and reporting that guards against unsound practices. Starting with a well-defined research question allows researchers to create an efficient study to answer it, and guards against poor research practices that lead to false positives and poor replicability. Correct and appropriate statistical models give sound conclusions, good reporting practices and a focus on ecological relevance make results impactful and replicable.
Illustrated with an example from a recent study into the impact of disturbance on upland swamps, this paper explains the rationale for the selection and use of effective statistical practices and provides practical guidance for ecologists seeking to improve their use of statistical methods.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform: Preprint, Postprint
Keywords: Methodology (stat.ME); Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE); Applications (stat.AP); FOS: Computer and information sciences; FOS: Computer and information sciences; FOS: Biological sciences; FOS: Biological sciences; Statistical principles; HARKing; p-hacking; ecological relevance; statistical significance; reproducibility; research waste; assumptions
Institutionen der Universität: Fakultäten > Fakultät für Biologie, Chemie und Geowissenschaften
Fakultäten > Fakultät für Biologie, Chemie und Geowissenschaften > Fachgruppe Biologie
Forschungseinrichtungen > Zentrale wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen > Bayreuther Zentrum für Ökologie und Umweltforschung - BayCEER
Fakultäten
Forschungseinrichtungen
Forschungseinrichtungen > Zentrale wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen
Titel an der UBT entstanden: Ja
Themengebiete aus DDC: 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 500 Naturwissenschaften
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Eingestellt am: 07 Feb 2023 07:51
Letzte Änderung: 17 Okt 2023 09:22
URI: https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/73589

Zu diesem Eintrag verfügbare Versionen