at Google ScholarTitle data
Köhler, Ben:
Blaming the middleman? Refusal of relief for mediator misconduct under the Singapore Convention.
In: Journal of Private International Law.
Vol. 19
(2023)
Issue 1
.
- pp. 42-66.
ISSN 1744-1048
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2023.2189779
Abstract in another language
The discussion surrounding the Singapore Convention on Mediation 2018 has gathered steam. In particular, the refusal of enforcement based on mediator misconduct as prescribed in Article 5(1)(e) and (f) has been the focus of debate and is widely perceived to be the Convention’s Achilles heel. These two provisions, already highly controversial in the drafting process, have been criticised as ill-suited to a voluntary process and likely to provoke ancillary dispute. This article defends these grounds for refusal, arguing that they play an indispensable role in guaranteeing the legitimacy of mediated settlements enforced under the Convention. It addresses some of the interpretative challenges within Article 5(1)(e) and (f) before discussing the tension between the provisions on mediator misconduct and the confidentiality of the mediation. The article then offers some guidance on how parties may limit the effects of the provisions, concluding with a brief outlook for the future.