at Google ScholarTitle data
Heisse, Christiane:
Whither economics imperialism? Debating Ambrosino, Cedrini and Davis.
In: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.
Vol. 32
(2025)
Issue 1
.
- pp. 136-156.
ISSN 1469-5936
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2024.2433980
Abstract in another language
This paper comments on “Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand,” published recently in EJHET. The original paper offers a welcome discussion of economics imperialism in the recent and contemporary history of economic thought. This response critically interrogates three of its main ideas, that: (i) economics imperialism is a bygone era; (ii) economics experienced a phase of reverse imperialisms; and (iii) economics has therefore become truly pluralist and welcoming of heterodoxy. Drawing on Ben Fine’s theoretical framework and the example of natural capital, I argue that economics imperialism is alive and well, if under the guise of interdisciplinarity.
Further data
| Item Type: | Article in a journal |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Keywords: | Economics imperialism; natural capital; interdisciplinarity; pluralism; heterodoxy |
| Institutions of the University: | Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences > Department of Earth Sciences Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences > Department of Earth Sciences > Chair Economic Geography Faculties > Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences > Department of Earth Sciences > Chair Economic Geography > Chair Economic Geography - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Ouma |
| Result of work at the UBT: | No |
| DDC Subjects: | 300 Social sciences 300 Social sciences > 320 Political science 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics 300 Social sciences > 370 Education 900 History and geography |
| Date Deposited: | 14 May 2025 11:55 |
| Last Modified: | 14 May 2025 11:55 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/93528 |