Giant planet formation in the Solar System

Titelangaben

Raorane, A. ; Brasser, R. ; Matsumura, S. ; Lau, T. C. H. ; Lee, M. H. ; Bouvier, Audrey:
Giant planet formation in the Solar System.
In: Icarus. Bd. 421 (2024) . - 116231.
ISSN 0019-1035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116231

Volltext

Link zum Volltext (externe URL):

Abstract

The formation history of Jupiter has been of interest due to its ability to shape the solar system’s history. Yet little attention has been paid to the formation and growth of Saturn and the other giant planets. Here we explore through N-body simulations the implications of the simplest disc and pebble accretion model with steady-state accretion and an assumed ring structure in the disc at 5 AU on the formation of the giant planets in the solar system. We conducted a statistical survey of different disc parameters and initial conditions of the protoplanetary disc to establish which combination best reproduces the present outer solar system. We examined the effect of the initial planetesimal disc mass, the number of planetesimals and their size-frequency distribution slope, pebble accretion prescription and sticking efficiency on the likelihood of forming gas giants and their orbital distribution. The results reveal that the accretion sticking efficiency is the most sensitive parameter to control the final masses and number of giant planets. We have been unable to replicate the formation of all three types of giant planets in the solar system in a single simulation. The probability distribution of the final location of the giant planets is approximately constant in logr, suggesting there is a slight preference for formation closer to the Sun but no preference for more massive planets to form closer. The eccentricity distribution has a higher mean for more massive planets indicating that systems with more massive planets are more violent. We compute the average formation time for proto-Jupiter to reach 10 Earth masses to be 〈tc,J〉=1.1±0.3 Myr and for proto-Saturn 〈tc,S〉=3.3±0.4 Myr, while for the ice giants this increases to 〈tc,I〉=4.9±0.1 Myr. The formation timescales of the cores of the gas giants are distinct at >95 confidence, suggesting that they formed sequentially.