Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and Coherent Aggregation

Titelangaben

Rafiee Rad, Soroush ; Roy, Olivier:
Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and Coherent Aggregation.
In: American Political Science Review. Bd. 115 (2021) Heft 2 . - S. 629-648.
ISSN 1537-5943
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420001045

Angaben zu Projekten

Abstract

Rational deliberation helps to avoid cyclic or intransitive group preferences by fostering meta-agreements, which in turn ensures single-peaked profiles. This is the received view, but this paper argues that it should be qualified. On the one hand we provide evidence from computational simulations that rational deliberation tend to increase proximity to so-called single-plateaued preferences. This evidence is important to the extend that, as we argue, the idea that rational deliberation fosters the creation of meta-agreement and, in turn, single-peaked profiles does not carry over to single-plateaued ones, and the latter but not the former makes coherent aggregation possible when the participants are allowed to express indifference between
options. On the other hand, however, our computational results show, against the received view, that when the participants are strongly biased towards their own
opinions, rational deliberation tends to create irrational group preferences, instead of eliminating them. These results are independent of whether the participants reach
meta-agreements in the process, and as such highlight the importance of rational preference change and biases towards one’s own opinion in understanding the effects of rational deliberation.