bei Google ScholarTitelangaben
Henzler, Dennis ; Schmidt, Sebastian ; Koçar, Ayca ; Herdegen, Sophie ; Lindinger, Georg Ludwig ; Maris, Menno T. ; Bak, Marieke A. R. ; Willems, Dick L. ; Tan, Hanno L. ; Lauerer, Michael ; Nagel, Eckhard ; Hindricks, Gerhard ; Dagres, Nikolaos ; Konopka, Magdalena J.:
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on artificial intelligence in patient care : a systematic review of hindering and facilitating factors on different levels.
In: BMC Health Services Research.
Bd. 25
(2025)
.
- 633.
ISSN 1472-6963
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12664-2
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications present opportunities to enhance the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various diseases. To successfully integrate and utilize AI in healthcare, it is crucial to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals and to address challenges they associate with AI adoption at an early stage. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of empirical studies that explore healthcare professionals’ perspectives on AI in healthcare.
Methods
The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. The databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched in the timeline of 2017 to 2024 using terms related to ‘healthcare professionals’, ‘artificial intelligence’, and ‘perspectives’. Eligible were peer-reviewed articles that employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approaches. Extracted facilitating and hindering factors were analysed according to the dimensions of the socio-ecological model.
Results
Our search yielded 4,499 articles published up to February 2024. After title abstract screening, 150 full-texts were assessed for eligibility, and 72 studies were ultimately included in our synthesis. The extracted perspectives on AI were thematically analyzed using the socioecological model in order to identify various levels of influence and to categorize them into facilitating and hindering factors. In total, we identified 49 facilitating and 43 hindering factors across all levels of the socioecological model.
Conclusions
The findings from this review can serve as a foundation for developing guidelines for AI implementation adressing various stakeholders, from healthcare professionals to policymakers. Future research should focus on the empirical adoption of AI applications and, if possible, further examine the hindering factors associated with different types of AI.
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel in einer Zeitschrift |
|---|---|
| Begutachteter Beitrag: | Ja |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Fakultäten > Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Lehrstuhl Medizinmanagement und Gesundheitswissenschaften Fakultäten > Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Lehrstuhl Medizinmanagement und Gesundheitswissenschaften > Lehrstuhl Medizinmanagement und Gesundheitswissenschaften - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. Dr. h.c. Eckhard Nagel |
| Titel an der UBT entstanden: | Ja |
| Themengebiete aus DDC: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
| Eingestellt am: | 02 Mai 2025 06:24 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 02 Mai 2025 06:24 |
| URI: | https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/93430 |